Prince v. . International Railway Company
115 N.E. 1050, 220 N.Y. 561, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1004
This text of 115 N.E. 1050 (Prince v. . International Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Prince v. . International Railway Company, 115 N.E. 1050, 220 N.Y. 561, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1004 (N.Y. 1917).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
*562 Concur: Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.; Hisoooic, Ch. J., Chase, Collin and Cuddebaok, JJ., concur on the ground that the question whether the act complained of was within the scope of the conductor’s authority was not sufficiently raised at the trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
115 N.E. 1050, 220 N.Y. 561, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prince-v-international-railway-company-ny-1917.