Prince v. Guyer
This text of 103 S.W.2d 128 (Prince v. Guyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By their application plaintiffs in error seek to bring here for review an order of the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals of the Seventh District, overruling their motion to affirm the case on certificate. It would appear from the showing made in the application that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is in conflict with the recent decision of this Court in Jarrell et al. v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ State Bond Bank of Poth, 128 Texas 332, [92]*9299 S. W. (2d) 281; but the order appealed from is interlocutory, and this Court is therefore without jurisdiction to grant the application. It is accordingly dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Wandelhor v. Rainey, 100 Texas 471, 100 S. W. 1156; Casey v. Bell, 104 Texas 338, 137 S. W. 918.
Opinion delivered March 3, 1937.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 S.W.2d 128, 129 Tex. 90, 1937 Tex. LEXIS 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prince-v-guyer-tex-1937.