Prince v. David Gray, Warden, Belmont Correctional
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER PRINCE, : Petitioner, CASE NO. 2:20-CV-4102 v. CHIEF JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY WARDEN, BELMONT Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, : Respondent. ORDER On August 18, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases recommending that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed. (ECF No. 3.) Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. Petitioner’s Motion for Leave and Request for Service (ECF No. 4) is DENIED, as moot. Petitioner has waived his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). The Court therefore DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS SO ORDERED.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: January 20, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prince v. David Gray, Warden, Belmont Correctional (Prince v. David Gray, Warden, Belmont Correctional) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.