Prince v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided March 10, 2020·No. 6:18-cv-01219-CL·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

SHELLEY LEE PRINCE, 6:18-cv-01219-CL Plaintiff, vs. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $1,985.45 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiff's attorney and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney’s office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Portland OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds afte of the debt shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaipsiffs a ei stated above. DATED this_/© day of LV. 60.

Z Mark D. Clarke Lf United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prince v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2020).

Prince v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Prince v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)