Prince v. . Brooklyn Rapid Transit Company
115 N.E. 1049, 220 N.Y. 610, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1061
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and Crane, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock, Oh. J., and Cardozo, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prince v. . Brooklyn Rapid Transit Company, 115 N.E. 1049, 220 N.Y. 610, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1061 (N.Y. 1917).
115 N.E. 1049 (Prince v. . Brooklyn Rapid Transit Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.