Prince Law v. McCausland Keen & Buckman
This text of Prince Law v. McCausland Keen & Buckman (Prince Law v. McCausland Keen & Buckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
PRINCE LAW OFFICES, P.C., : No. 33 MAL 2018 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : MCCAUSLAND KEEN & BUCKMAN, : MCNELLY & GOLDSTEIN, LLC & JON S. : MIROWITZ, ESQUIRE, : : Respondents :
PRINCE LAW OFFICES, P.C., : No. 34 MAL 2018 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : MCCAUSLAND KEEN & BUCKMAN, : MCNELLY & GOLDSTEIN, LLC & JON S. : MIROWITZ, ESQUIRE, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 9th day of July, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Prince Law v. McCausland Keen & Buckman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prince-law-v-mccausland-keen-buckman-pa-2018.