Primus v. Portage Metro. Hous. Auth.

2019 Ohio 2099
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 28, 2019
Docket2019-P-0060
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 Ohio 2099 (Primus v. Portage Metro. Hous. Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Primus v. Portage Metro. Hous. Auth., 2019 Ohio 2099 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

[Cite as Primus v. Portage Metro. Hous. Auth., 2019-Ohio-2099.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO

SHARYLL PRIMUS, : MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, : CASE NO. 2019-P-0060 - vs - :

PORTAGE METROPOLITAN HOUSING : AUTHORITY, et al., : Appellee.

Administrative Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2017 CV 00879.

Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

Sharyll Primus, pro se, P.O. Box 2501, Akron, OH 44309 (Appellant).

Antonios C. Scavdis, Jr., Scavdis & Scavdis, L.L.C., 261 West Spruce Avenue, P.O. Box 978, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Appellee).

MATT LYNCH, J.

{¶1} Appellant, Sharyll Primus, filed a pro se appeal on April 25, 2019, from an

entry of the Portage County Court of Common Pleas.

{¶2} App.R. 3(A) expressly states that the only jurisdictional requirement for filing

a valid appeal is to file it within the time allowed by App.R. 4. The Supreme Court has

held that the failure to comply with the time requirements of App.R. 4(A) is a jurisdictional

defect, which is fatal to an appeal. In re H.F., 120 Ohio St.3d 499, 2008-Ohio-6810, ¶ 17,

citing State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60 (1988). {¶3} “Subject to the provisions of App.R. 4(A)(3), a party who wishes to appeal

from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R.

3 within 30 days of that entry.” See App.R. 4(A)(1). Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of

courts to serve the parties with notice of the entry within three days of entering the

judgment upon the journal. If Civ.R. 58(B) service does not occur within three days, the

time to appeal does not begin to run until service is made and noted in the appearance

docket. Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 163 Ohio App.3d 659, 664, 2005-Ohio-5360.

{¶4} Here, the record shows the trial court issued its entry on March 25, 2019.

The clerk of courts noted on the appearance docket that copies were issued to the parties

on that same date. Since service was made on appellant within the three-day period

required in Civ.R. 58(B), the thirty-day period began to run on the date of entry of

judgment, i.e. March 25, 2019. The deadline for appellant to file her appeal was April 24,

2019, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Thus, appellant’s April 25, 2019 notice of

appeal was untimely filed.

{¶5} This court is not empowered to extend the time deadline in civil cases.

Pendell, supra, at 60; see also App.R. 14(B).

{¶6} Based upon the foregoing, this appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed

pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1).

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,

TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J.,

concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re H.F.
2008 Ohio 6810 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.
839 N.E.2d 982 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams County Board of Elections
531 N.E.2d 713 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 Ohio 2099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/primus-v-portage-metro-hous-auth-ohioctapp-2019.