Primo v. United States Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Primo v. United States Casualty Co.

169 A.D. 912, 153 N.Y.S. 1138

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 169 A.D. 912 (Primo v. United States Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Primo v. United States Casualty Co., 169 A.D. 912, 153 N.Y.S. 1138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Interlocutory judgment reversed, with costs, and demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to the plaintiff to plead over within twenty days upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that the limitation of the defendant’s liability to the insured as to collision with a conveyance applies only to the case of ahired chauffeur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interlocutory judgment reversed, with costs, and demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to the plaintiff to plead over within twenty days upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that the limitation of the defendant’s liability to the insured as to collision with a conveyance applies only to the case of ahired chauffeur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 A.D. 912, 153 N.Y.S. 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/primo-v-united-states-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1915.