Prime v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Prime v. State

161 S.E. 292, 44 Ga. App. 288, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 674

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 11, 1931

Docket21728

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 S.E. 292 (Prime v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prime v. State, 161 S.E. 292, 44 Ga. App. 288, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 674 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

“The judgment of a committing court, that the defendant bo committed or give bond, etc., can not be corrected by the superior court by certiorari.” Hyden v. State, 40 Ga. 476 (2) ; Strickland v. Hamilton, 148 Ga. 820 (98 S. E. 471). The judge of the superior court therefore did not err in refusing to sanction a petition for certiorari and in denying an order for a writ of certiorari to issue to a justice’s court in a bastardy case.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

“The judgment of a committing court, that the defendant bo committed or give bond, etc., can not be corrected by the superior court by certiorari.” Hyden v. State, 40 Ga. 476 (2) ; Strickland v. Hamilton, 148 Ga. 820 (98 S. E. 471). The judge of the superior court therefore did not err in refusing to sanction a petition for certiorari and in denying an order for a writ of certiorari to issue to a justice’s court in a bastardy case.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 S.E. 292, 44 Ga. App. 288, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prime-v-state-gactapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack