Prime Motor Inns, Inc. v. Waltman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Prime Motor Inns, Inc. v. Waltman

562 So. 2d 725, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2829, 1990 WL 49848

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 24, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1740

StatusPublished

This text of 562 So. 2d 725 (Prime Motor Inns, Inc. v. Waltman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prime Motor Inns, Inc. v. Waltman, 562 So. 2d 725, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2829, 1990 WL 49848 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Prime Motor Inns, Inc., appeals from an adverse final judgment in an action for diversion of proceeds from the sale of Prime-Florida, Inc.’s leasehold interest. We affirm.

Substantial competent evidence in the record supports the interrogatory verdict that a written lease existed. See Firestone Serv. Stores, Inc., v. Wynn, 131 Fla. 94, 179 So. 175 (1938); Onontario of Florida, Inc. v. R.P. Trucking, Co., 399 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Action Fire Safety v. Biscayne Fire Equip. Co., 383 So.2d 969 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The record also reflects ample substantial evidence to support the jury’s damage award. See R.A. Jones & Sons, Inc. v. Holman, 470 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. dismissed sub nom. Ford Motor Co. v. R.A. Jones & Sons, Inc., 482 So.2d 348 (Fla.1986); Conner v. Atlas Aircraft Corp., 310 So.2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 322 So.2d 913 (Fla.1975). See also Callihan v. Turtle Kraals, Ltd, 523 So.2d 800 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Phillips v. Ostrer, 481 So.2d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 492 So.2d 1334 (Fla.1986).

Appellant’s remaining point on appeal is without merit. See Prime Management Co. v. W & C Assocs., Ltd., 548 So.2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), rev. denied 560 So.2d 234 (Fla.1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Prime Motor Inns, Inc., appeals from an adverse final judgment in an action for diversion of proceeds from the sale of Prime-Florida, Inc.’s leasehold interest. We affirm.

Substantial competent evidence in the record supports the interrogatory verdict that a written lease existed. See Firestone Serv. Stores, Inc., v. Wynn, 131 Fla. 94, 179 So. 175 (1938); Onontario of Florida, Inc. v. R.P. Trucking, Co., 399 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Action Fire Safety v. Biscayne Fire Equip. Co., 383 So.2d 969 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The record also reflects ample substantial evidence to support the jury’s damage award. See R.A. Jones & Sons, Inc. v. Holman, 470 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. dismissed sub nom. Ford Motor Co. v. R.A. Jones & Sons, Inc., 482 So.2d 348 (Fla.1986); Conner v. Atlas Aircraft Corp., 310 So.2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 322 So.2d 913 (Fla.1975). See also Callihan v. Turtle Kraals, Ltd, 523 So.2d 800 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Phillips v. Ostrer, 481 So.2d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 492 So.2d 1334 (Fla.1986).

Appellant’s remaining point on appeal is without merit. See Prime Management Co. v. W & C Assocs., Ltd., 548 So.2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), rev. denied 560 So.2d 234 (Fla.1990).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

562 So. 2d 725, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2829, 1990 WL 49848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prime-motor-inns-inc-v-waltman-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack