Prime Insurance Syndicate, Inc. v. Conboy

251 F. App'x 656
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 2007
DocketNo. 07-10232
StatusPublished

This text of 251 F. App'x 656 (Prime Insurance Syndicate, Inc. v. Conboy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prime Insurance Syndicate, Inc. v. Conboy, 251 F. App'x 656 (11th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Plaintiff appeals following the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Defendants on all four counts of its complaint. The court erred, the Plaintiff contends, in granting summary judgment on each of the counts. We affirm.

Summary judgment was properly granted on the tortious interference claims in Counts I and II because of a break in the chain of causation as outlined in the district court’s Memorandum Opinion. (R.2-86 at 6.) Similarly, summary judgment was properly granted on the abuse of process claim in Count III for the same reason, as explained in the district court’s Memorandum Opinion. (R.2-86 at 6-7.)

And finally, summary judgment was properly granted on the Count IV civil conspiracy claim because the Plaintiff failed to establish a tort underlying any alleged conspiracy. We express no opinion as to whether any assignment of the bad faith claim would be effective because any such assignment, even if ineffective, would not be tortious.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 F. App'x 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prime-insurance-syndicate-inc-v-conboy-ca11-2007.