Prime Income Asset Management, Inc. v. American Real Estate Holdings, Lp
927 N.E.2d 560, 14 N.Y.3d 858, 901 N.Y.S.2d 140, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 1031
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that simultaneous appeals do not lie to both the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals (see Parker v Rogerson, 35 NY2d 751, 753 [1974]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prime Income Asset Management, Inc. v. American Real Estate Holdings, Lp, 927 N.E.2d 560, 14 N.Y.3d 858, 901 N.Y.S.2d 140, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 1031 (N.Y. 2010).
927 N.E.2d 560 (Prime Income Asset Management, Inc. v. American Real Estate Holdings, Lp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parker v. Rogerson
320 N.E.2d 650 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)