Prime Healthcare Services, LLC v. Brotman Medical Center, Inc.

442 F. App'x 317
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 13, 2011·No. 09-56907·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

We affirm the judgment of the district court that Prime Healthcare Services, LLC’s appeal of the confirmation order is equitably moot. Here, the substantial consummation of the reorganization plan is a “comprehensive change of circumstances” which makes granting the relief sought inequitable. See Focus Media v. Nat’l Broadcasting Co., 378 F.3d 916, 923 (9th *318 Cir.2004). Requiring Brotman Medical Center, Inc. to pay Prime Healthcare an additional sum of money would unjustly affect the rights of other creditors and investors, particularly Brotmaris shareholders, whose equity interests would be placed below Prime Healthcare’s claim. Because allowing Prime Healthcare to contest the now-consummated reorganization plan “would knock the props out from under the authorization for every transaction that has taken place,” In re Roberts Farms, Inc., 652 F.2d 798, 797 (9th Cir.1981), we affirm. 1

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Brotman’s unopposed Motion for Judicial Notice is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prime Healthcare Services, LLC v. Brotman Medical Center, Inc., 442 F. App'x 317 (9th Cir. 2011).

442 F. App'x 317 (Prime Healthcare Services, LLC v. Brotman Medical Center, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related