Prime Fur Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Prime Fur Corp. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 374, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 167

United States Customs Court·Decided March 12, 1953·No. No. 57137; protests 934175-G, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Prime Fur Corp. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 374, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 167 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

30 Cust. Ct. 374 (Prime Fur Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related