Priester v. Ratlieff

572 So. 2d 1003, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9760, 1990 WL 211723
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 1990·No. No. 89-2166·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find no error by the trial court in concluding that the issue as to the cause of the accident in question should be decided by the jury in light of all the circumstances shown to have prevailed at the time. See Tellechea v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc., 530 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and FENNELLY, JOHN E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Priester v. Ratlieff, 572 So. 2d 1003, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9760, 1990 WL 211723 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

572 So. 2d 1003 (Priester v. Ratlieff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tellechea v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.
530 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)