Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Priester v. Ratlieff

Priester v. Ratlieff

572 So. 2d 1003, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9760, 1990 WL 211723
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 28, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2166
StatusPublished

This text of 572 So. 2d 1003 (Priester v. Ratlieff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Priester v. Ratlieff, 572 So. 2d 1003, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9760, 1990 WL 211723 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find no error by the trial court in concluding that the issue as to the cause of the accident in question should be decided by the jury in light of all the circumstances shown to have prevailed at the time. See Tellechea v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc., 530 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and FENNELLY, JOHN E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tellechea v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.
530 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 So. 2d 1003, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9760, 1990 WL 211723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priester-v-ratlieff-fladistctapp-1990.