Priest v. State
This text of 265 So. 2d 916 (Priest v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant pled guilty to an indictment ' charging burglary in the second degree and. was sentenced to eighteen months in the-penitentiary.
The record does not show any colloquy between the -judge and the defendant to< show compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274.
On authority of Honeycutt v. State, 47 Ala.App. 640, 259 So.2d 846, and Walcott v. State, 288 Ala. 546, 263 So.2d 178, the judgment appealed from must be reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 So. 2d 916, 48 Ala. App. 474, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priest-v-state-alacrimapp-1972.