Priest v. State
265 So. 2d 916, 48 Ala. App. 474, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 934
Opinion
The appellant pled guilty to an indictment ' charging burglary in the second degree and. was sentenced to eighteen months in the-penitentiary.
The record does not show any colloquy between the -judge and the defendant to< show compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274.
On authority of Honeycutt v. State, 47 Ala.App. 640, 259 So.2d 846, and Walcott v. State, 288 Ala. 546, 263 So.2d 178, the judgment appealed from must be reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Priest v. State, 265 So. 2d 916, 48 Ala. App. 474, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 934 (Ala. Ct. App. 1972).
265 So. 2d 916 (Priest v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Honeycuttt v. State
259 So. 2d 846 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
In RE WALCOTT v. State
263 So. 2d 178 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)