Priest v. Sobeck

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Priest v. Sobeck

592 S.E.2d 694, 358 N.C. 155

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Priest v. Sobeck. Read the opinion of the Court — 357 N.C. 159 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 2004·No. 599P02-2·Published

Opinion

592 S.E.2d 694 (2004) 358 N.C. 155

Pamela PRIEST and Betty Lou Skinner
v.
Thomas SOBECK and Make-Up Artists and Hair Stylists Local 798, of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Motion Picture Operators of the United States and Canada.

No. 599P02-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

David G. Schiller, Marvin Schiller, Raleigh, for Priest and Skinner.

Seth R. Cohen, Greensboro, Robert S. Giolito, Los Angeles, CA, Jeffrey D. Sodko, for Sobeck et al.

Prior report: 160 N.CApp. 230, 584 S.E.2d 867.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st day of October 2003 by Plaintiffs' in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs' on the 1st day of October 2003 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

592 S.E.2d 694 (2004) 358 N.C. 155

Pamela PRIEST and Betty Lou Skinner
v.
Thomas SOBECK and Make-Up Artists and Hair Stylists Local 798, of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Motion Picture Operators of the United States and Canada.

No. 599P02-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

David G. Schiller, Marvin Schiller, Raleigh, for Priest and Skinner.

Seth R. Cohen, Greensboro, Robert S. Giolito, Los Angeles, CA, Jeffrey D. Sodko, for Sobeck et al.

Prior report: 160 N.CApp. 230, 584 S.E.2d 867.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st day of October 2003 by Plaintiffs' in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs' on the 1st day of October 2003 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."

Priest v. Sobeck, 592 S.E.2d 694, 358 N.C. 155 (N.C. 2004).

Pincite

592 S.E.2d 694 (Priest v. Sobeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Pamela PRIEST and Betty Lou Skinner v. Thomas SOBECK and Make-Up Artists and Hair Stylists Local 798, of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Motion Picture Operators of the United States and Canada.

ORDER

Related

Pamela PRIEST and Betty Lou Skinner
v.
Thomas SOBECK and Make-Up Artists and Hair Stylists Local 798, of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Motion Picture Operators of the United States and Canada.