Priest, Rec. v. Amos, Rec.

161 N.E. 272, 87 Ind. App. 609, 1928 Ind. App. LEXIS 76
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 27, 1928
DocketNo. 13,036.
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 161 N.E. 272 (Priest, Rec. v. Amos, Rec.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Priest, Rec. v. Amos, Rec., 161 N.E. 272, 87 Ind. App. 609, 1928 Ind. App. LEXIS 76 (Ind. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Nichols, J.

The sole appellant in this action is a receiver appointed by the Rush Circuit Court, and this is an appeal taken from an order made in the receivership proceedings by the same court, respecting funds of the receivership in the possession of such receiver. The order merely requires appellant to pay appellee a certain sum of money out of assets of the receivership in his hands as such receiver. Appellant cannot question the correctness of such an order, and has no authority or right to maintain this appeal. Herrick v. Miller, Exr. (1890), 123 Ind. 304; 2 Cyc 641; Stoner, Admx., v. Gloystein (1923), 193 Ind. 614, 140 N. E. 435.-

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hatton v. Fraternal Order of Eagles, Aerie 4097
551 N.E.2d 479 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1990)
Guyton v. Howard
525 So. 2d 948 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Aspell v. American Contract Bridge League of Memphis
595 P.2d 191 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1979)
California State University v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
47 Cal. App. 3d 533 (California Court of Appeal, 1975)
Libby v. Perry
311 A.2d 527 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1973)
Cunningham v. Independent Soap & Chemical Workers
486 P.2d 1316 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1971)
Gonzales v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union
419 P.2d 257 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1966)
Harper v. Gribble
355 P.2d 526 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1960)
Taxicab Drivers' Local Union No. 889 v. Pittman
1957 OK 259 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1957)
Moore v. District 50 of United Mine Workers of America
131 N.E.2d 462 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division, 1954)
Barnhart v. United Automobile, Etc., Local 669
79 A.2d 88 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Pascale v. Emery
95 F. Supp. 147 (D. Massachusetts, 1951)
Cook v. Collins
48 S.E.2d 161 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1948)
International Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union v. Smith
198 S.W.2d 729 (Texas Supreme Court, 1946)
In Re Fidelity Assurance Ass'n
20 N.W.2d 638 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1945)
Feldman v. North British & Mercantile Ins.
137 F.2d 266 (Fourth Circuit, 1943)
United States v. White
137 F.2d 24 (Third Circuit, 1943)
Smetherham v. Laundry Workers' Union, Local No. 75
111 P.2d 948 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 N.E. 272, 87 Ind. App. 609, 1928 Ind. App. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priest-rec-v-amos-rec-indctapp-1928.