Priest, Rec. v. Amos, Rec.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Priest, Rec. v. Amos, Rec.

161 N.E. 272, 87 Ind. App. 609, 1928 Ind. App. LEXIS 76

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided April 27, 1928·No. No. 13,036.·Published·Cited by 25 cases

Opinion

Nichols, J.

The sole appellant in this action is a receiver appointed by the Rush Circuit Court, and this is an appeal taken from an order made in the receivership proceedings by the same court, respecting funds of the receivership in the possession of such receiver. The order merely requires appellant to pay appellee a certain sum of money out of assets of the receivership in his hands as such receiver. Appellant cannot question the correctness of such an order, and has no authority or right to maintain this appeal. Herrick v. Miller, Exr. (1890), 123 Ind. 304; 2 Cyc 641; Stoner, Admx., v. Gloystein (1923), 193 Ind. 614, 140 N. E. 435.-

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, J.

The sole appellant in this action is a receiver appointed by the Rush Circuit Court, and this is an appeal taken from an order made in the receivership proceedings by the same court, respecting funds of the receivership in the possession of such receiver. The order merely requires appellant to pay appellee a certain sum of money out of assets of the receivership in his hands as such receiver. Appellant cannot question the correctness of such an order, and has no authority or right to maintain this appeal. Herrick v. Miller, Exr. (1890), 123 Ind. 304; 2 Cyc 641; Stoner, Admx., v. Gloystein (1923), 193 Ind. 614, 140 N. E. 435.-

Appeal dismissed.

Priest, Rec. v. Amos, Rec., 161 N.E. 272, 87 Ind. App. 609, 1928 Ind. App. LEXIS 76 (Ind. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

161 N.E. 272 (Priest, Rec. v. Amos, Rec.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related