Priest & Benson v. Watkins

2 Hill & Den. 225
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1842
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Hill & Den. 225 (Priest & Benson v. Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Priest & Benson v. Watkins, 2 Hill & Den. 225 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1842).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

That independent of the provisions of the revised statutes as to executors de son tort, the letters of administration would have related back, and legalized the payment in question, can admit of little doubt; (see Rattoon v. Overacker, 8 John. Rep. 126; 1 Williams on Ex. 240, 396, 7;) and we are of opinion that those provisions were not intended to operate any alteration-of the law in this respect. The circuit judge properly nonsuited the plaintiffs, and a new trial should be denied.

New trial denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rattoon v. Overacker
8 Johns. 126 (New York Supreme Court, 1811)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Hill & Den. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priest-benson-v-watkins-nysupct-1842.