Pridgeon v. State
This text of 887 So. 2d 427 (Pridgeon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are constrained to affirm this appeal from summary denial of a motion seeking postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 because the motion was not sworn. See Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1993). However, because appellant requested leave in the trial court to remedy this deficiency, which was denied, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file in the trial court an amended motion which is properly sworn to within 30 days of the date on which this court’s mandate issues. See Hickey v. State, 763 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
887 So. 2d 427, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16634, 2004 WL 2481381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pridgeon-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.