Pridgen v. Shannon, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Frackville
543 U.S. 1155, 125 S. Ct. 1298
This text of 543 U.S. 1155 (Pridgen v. Shannon, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Frackville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pridgen v. Shannon, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Frackville, 543 U.S. 1155, 125 S. Ct. 1298 (2005).
Opinion
543 U.S. 1155
PRIDGEN
v.
SHANNON, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FRACKVILLE, ET AL.
No. 04-7060.
Supreme Court of United States.
February 22, 2005.
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 380 F. 3d 721.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
James Mario Pridgen v. Shannon the District Attorney of the County of Lancaster the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
380 F.3d 721 (Third Circuit, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
543 U.S. 1155, 125 S. Ct. 1298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pridgen-v-shannon-superintendent-state-correctional-institution-at-scotus-2005.