Pridgen v. Pridgen

509 So. 2d 1390, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9722
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 30, 1987·No. No. BS-16·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After careful review of the briefs and record, we conclude that the trial judge has not abused her discretion. The appealed order is AFFIRMED. McIntyre v. McIntyre, 452 So.2d 14 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) and Wilson v. Wilson, 504 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

SMITH, C.J., and WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pridgen v. Pridgen, 509 So. 2d 1390, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9722 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

509 So. 2d 1390 (Pridgen v. Pridgen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Wilson
504 So. 2d 1278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
McIntyre v. McIntyre
452 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)