Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pridgen v. Pridgen

Pridgen v. Pridgen

509 So. 2d 1390, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9722
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 30, 1987
DocketNo. BS-16
StatusPublished

This text of 509 So. 2d 1390 (Pridgen v. Pridgen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pridgen v. Pridgen, 509 So. 2d 1390, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9722 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After careful review of the briefs and record, we conclude that the trial judge has not abused her discretion. The appealed order is AFFIRMED. McIntyre v. McIntyre, 452 So.2d 14 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) and Wilson v. Wilson, 504 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

SMITH, C.J., and WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Wilson
504 So. 2d 1278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
McIntyre v. McIntyre
452 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
509 So. 2d 1390, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pridgen-v-pridgen-fladistctapp-1987.