Pridgen v. PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Pridgen v. PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION

982 A.2d 1225

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 4, 2009

Docket128 EM 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 982 A.2d 1225 (Pridgen v. PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pridgen v. PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION, 982 A.2d 1225 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

982 A.2d 1225 (2009)

Karen PRIDGEN, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lendon N. Pridgen, Deceased, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony W. Cipparone, Deceased and Denise Diggen, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Daniel Diggen, Deceased and Debra Johnson, Individually and on behalf of Tyler Johnson, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Tyler Johnson, a Minor
v.
PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION and Basco Flying Service, Inc. and Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division and Textron, Inc. and AVCO Corporation
Petition of Textron Inc., AVCO Corporation and Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division.

No. 128 EM 2009.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

November 4, 2009.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as an Application for Relief per Pa.R.A.P. 123 is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI