Pridgen v. Bonner

28 Tex. 799
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Willie, J.

—This suit was brought upon a promissory [800]*800note for $190, due January 1,1860. Judgment by default was rendered against defendant below on the 25th of March, 1861, for $200 92, which was less than the amount of principal and interest due at that day by $17 08," the error arising from a miscalculation of interest. The defendant below brings the case to this court, but makes no assignment of errors. The defendant in error asks that the miscalculation of interest may be corrected, the judgment reformed and rendered for the proper amount, and suggests delay, and asks for 10 per cent, damages upon the reformed judgment. Upon the authority of Wortham v. Harrison, 8 Tex., 141, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the plaintiff below, William Bonner, have and recover of the defendant, B. F. Pridgen, the sum of $190 principal and $28 interest, and 10 per cent, damages on the amount of said judgment for the delay, and all costs of suit. ■

Reeormed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pridgen v. Bonner, 28 Tex. 799 (Tex. 1866).

28 Tex. 799 (Pridgen v. Bonner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.
178 S.E. 819 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1934)
Findlay v. State of Texas
250 S.W. 651 (Texas Supreme Court, 1923)