Pride v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pride v. State

162 So. 3d 1147, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5886, 2015 WL 1847404

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 23, 2015

DocketNo. 1D15-1531

StatusPublished

This text of 162 So. 3d 1147 (Pride v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pride v. State, 162 So. 3d 1147, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5886, 2015 WL 1847404 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a belated appeal of a motion for postconviction relief. He represents he recently learned that the motion was never received by the lower tribunal. Because the motion was never actually filed below, there is no resulting order to appeal, and we must deny the petition for belated appeal.

Petitioner has tendered to this court a copy of the motion for postconviction relief which includes a date stamp on the face of the motion showing that it was given to prison officials for mailing on December 11, 2008. Accordingly, this disposition is without prejudice to petitioner’s right to file a copy of the motion for postconviction relief containing the date stamp with the lower tribunal.

ROBERTS, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a belated appeal of a motion for postconviction relief. He represents he recently learned that the motion was never received by the lower tribunal. Because the motion was never actually filed below, there is no resulting order to appeal, and we must deny the petition for belated appeal.

Petitioner has tendered to this court a copy of the motion for postconviction relief which includes a date stamp on the face of the motion showing that it was given to prison officials for mailing on December 11, 2008. Accordingly, this disposition is without prejudice to petitioner’s right to file a copy of the motion for postconviction relief containing the date stamp with the lower tribunal.

ROBERTS, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 So. 3d 1147, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5886, 2015 WL 1847404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pride-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.