Pride v. State

952 So. 2d 617, 2007 WL 935007
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 2007·No. 1D06-2813·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

952 So.2d 617 (2007)

Keith PRIDE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D06-2813.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 30, 2007.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Alan R. Dakan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Peters v. State, 919 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA) (affirming revocation of community control, finding "testimonial hearsay" rule set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), inapplicable to revocation proceedings, and certifying question of great public importance to Florida Supreme Court), review granted, 924 So.2d 809 (Fla. 2006).

KAHN, POLSTON and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pride v. State, 952 So. 2d 617, 2007 WL 935007 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

952 So. 2d 617 (Pride v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CITIZENS PROPERTY INS. CORP. v. Swinson
952 So. 2d 617 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)