Pride v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Pride v. State

742 S.W.2d 114, 294 Ark. 334

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 19, 1988·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Paul Pride, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert J. Morehead, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Paul Pride, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert J. Morehead, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Pride v. State, 742 S.W.2d 114, 294 Ark. 334 (Ark. 1988).

Pincite

742 S.W.2d 114 (Pride v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.