Priddy v. Talley, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Priddy v. Talley, Inc.

455 F.2d 520

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 2, 1972·No. No. 71-3282·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.¹ The district court correctly held that Feres [521]*521v. United States, 1950, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152, barred recovery. See also Layne v. United States, 7 Cir., 1961, 295 F.2d 433. Maryland for use of Levin v. United States, 1965, 381 U.S. 41, 85 S.Ct. 1293, 14 L.Ed.2d 205, does not require a different result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.¹ The district court correctly held that Feres [521]*521v. United States, 1950, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152, barred recovery. See also Layne v. United States, 7 Cir., 1961, 295 F.2d 433. Maryland for use of Levin v. United States, 1965, 381 U.S. 41, 85 S.Ct. 1293, 14 L.Ed.2d 205, does not require a different result.

Priddy v. Talley, Inc., 455 F.2d 520 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

455 F.2d 520 (Priddy v. Talley, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related