Priddy v. Talley, Inc.

455 F.2d 520
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 1972
DocketNo. 71-3282
StatusPublished

This text of 455 F.2d 520 (Priddy v. Talley, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Priddy v. Talley, Inc., 455 F.2d 520 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1 The district court correctly held that Feres [521]*521v. United States, 1950, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152, barred recovery. See also Layne v. United States, 7 Cir., 1961, 295 F.2d 433. Maryland for use of Levin v. United States, 1965, 381 U.S. 41, 85 S.Ct. 1293, 14 L.Ed.2d 205, does not require a different result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
455 F.2d 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priddy-v-talley-inc-ca5-1972.