Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Prida v. Communication Contractors

Prida v. Communication Contractors

658 So. 2d 110, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4533, 1995 WL 247867
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 1, 1995
DocketNo. 93-1496
StatusPublished

This text of 658 So. 2d 110 (Prida v. Communication Contractors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prida v. Communication Contractors, 658 So. 2d 110, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4533, 1995 WL 247867 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion appellant’s Issues I, II and III, but reverse Issue IV and remand with directions to the judge of compensation claims to award wage-loss benefits, pursuant to our opinion in Mac Papers, Inc. v. Cruz, 658 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Although Prida filed numerous job-search forms, the carrier admitted that it had not informed Prida of his obligation to perform a work search, and there was no evidence showing who, if anyone, did inform him.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mac Papers, Inc. v. Cruz
658 So. 2d 108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
658 So. 2d 110, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4533, 1995 WL 247867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prida-v-communication-contractors-fladistctapp-1995.