Prida v. Communication Contractors

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Prida v. Communication Contractors

658 So. 2d 110, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4533, 1995 WL 247867

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 1, 1995·No. No. 93-1496·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion appellant’s Issues I, II and III, but reverse Issue IV and remand with directions to the judge of compensation claims to award wage-loss benefits, pursuant to our opinion in Mac Papers, Inc. v. Cruz, 658 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Although Prida filed numerous job-search forms, the carrier admitted that it had not informed Prida of his obligation to perform a work search, and there was no evidence showing who, if anyone, did inform him.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion appellant’s Issues I, II and III, but reverse Issue IV and remand with directions to the judge of compensation claims to award wage-loss benefits, pursuant to our opinion in Mac Papers, Inc. v. Cruz, 658 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Although Prida filed numerous job-search forms, the carrier admitted that it had not informed Prida of his obligation to perform a work search, and there was no evidence showing who, if anyone, did inform him.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Prida v. Communication Contractors, 658 So. 2d 110, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4533, 1995 WL 247867 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

658 So. 2d 110 (Prida v. Communication Contractors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related