Prickett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad
34 Kan. 713
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Prickett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Kan. 748 →
Opinion
Motion for Rehearing.
This case is reported in 33 Kas. pp. 748, et seq. July 10, 1885, the railroad company filed a motion for a rehearing, [714]*714which was overruled, February 4,1886 — Horton, C. J., dissenting as follows: For the reasons stated in A. T. & S. F. Rld. Co. v. Shaft, supra, I think a rehearing should also be allowed in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prickett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad, 34 Kan. 713 (kan 1886).
34 Kan. 713 (Prickett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.