Prichard v. United States

339 U.S. 974, 70 S. Ct. 1029, 94 L. Ed. 1380, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 1822
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 5, 1950
DocketNo. 795
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 339 U.S. 974 (Prichard v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prichard v. United States, 339 U.S. 974, 70 S. Ct. 1029, 94 L. Ed. 1380, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 1822 (1950).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. [975]*975Justice Clark have disqualified themselves in this case. Because of this absence of a quorum, 28 U. S. C. § 1, and since a majority of the qualified justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next term of Court, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed under 28 U. S. C. § 2109, which provides that under these circumstances “the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court.”

Hugh B. Cox, Leslie W. Morris and Henry T. Duncan for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kime v. Barnard
144 Cal. App. 3d 246 (California Court of Appeal, 1983)
Anderson v. United States
417 U.S. 211 (Supreme Court, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
339 U.S. 974, 70 S. Ct. 1029, 94 L. Ed. 1380, 1950 U.S. LEXIS 1822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prichard-v-united-states-scotus-1950.