Price v. United States

10 F. App'x 801, 10 Fed. Appx. 801, 10 F. App’x 801, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 8936, 2001 WL 528120
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMay 7, 2001
DocketNo. 00-5085
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 F. App'x 801 (Price v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Price v. United States, 10 F. App'x 801, 10 Fed. Appx. 801, 10 F. App’x 801, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 8936, 2001 WL 528120 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

Opinion

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Donnie E. Price appeals from a final decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims, which held on summary judgment that the Department of Veteran Affairs (“the Department”) had not breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing or its contractual obligations in connection with Price’s purchase of a distressed Department property and its subsequent demolition by the City of Chicago. We affirm.

On appeal, Mr. Price alleges that the Department breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing because (1) an advertisement listing the subject property for sale indicated that there were no code violations present or demolition proceedings pending even though the Department was aware that such code violations were actually present and that such demolition proceedings were actually pending at the time the advertisement was published, (2) Mr. Price was never informed about the pending demolition proceedings by any Department personnel, and (3) Mr. Price was never given a copy of the installment contract he signed relating to the subject property.

We have fully reviewed the thorough opinion of the Court of Federal Claims. We have carefully examined the arguments presented by the parties in their briefs, and have considered in full the arguments made by the parties at oral argument.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Federal Claims, we agree that the Department did not breach a duty of good faith and fair dealing because there was no express substantive obligation of the contract to inform Mr. Price that there were code violations and ongoing demolition proceedings nor did the Department breach its other contractual obligations in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Detroit Housing Corp. v. United States
55 Fed. Cl. 410 (Federal Claims, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 F. App'x 801, 10 Fed. Appx. 801, 10 F. App’x 801, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 8936, 2001 WL 528120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-united-states-cafc-2001.