Price v. State

299 S.W.2d 141, 164 Tex. Crim. 312, 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2096
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 20, 1957·No. 28778·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The offense is felony theft by false pretext; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The order of the court overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial shows that he excepted thereto, and instead of giving notice of appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals, said order recites that appellant “announced his intention of appealing to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.”

The announced intention of appealing a case does not comply with the statutory requisite of giving notice of appeal which is necessary to confer jurisdiction upon this court. Art. 827, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

It is pointed out that the recognizance which appears in the record does not show to have been entered into by two sureties as required by statute but only by the appellant. Such a recognizance is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon this court.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. State, 299 S.W.2d 141, 164 Tex. Crim. 312, 1957 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2096 (Tex. 1957).

299 S.W.2d 141 (Price v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newby v. State
384 S.W.2d 133 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Mayfield v. State
382 S.W.2d 940 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Dowd v. State
334 S.W.2d 806 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Price v. State
308 S.W.2d 47 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)