Price v. State

154 S.W. 545, 69 Tex. Crim. 492, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 144
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Price v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 Tex. Crim. 400
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 5, 1913·No. No. 2322.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a conviction for aggravated assault.

The statement of facts is not incorporated in nor accompanies the record, nor does the record contain any bill of exceptions.

. The motion for new trial sets up the fact,—first, that appellant pleaded guilty on the advice of his father and that his father induced appellant to. plead guilty on the representation of the County Attorney, and that by such representations 'they were both induced to believe defendant would receive the lowest punishment. This is not verified in any manner. It is signed, however, by defendant through his counsel. The record does not contain ahy evidence introduced in support of the allegation, nor was any bill of exception reserved verifying the matter mentioned. The same may be said about the allegations contained in the second ground of the motion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. State, 154 S.W. 545, 69 Tex. Crim. 492, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 144 (Tex. 1913).

154 S.W. 545 (Price v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.