Price v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Price v. State

154 S.W. 545, 69 Tex. Crim. 492, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 144

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 5, 1913

DocketNo. 2322.

StatusPublished

This text of 154 S.W. 545 (Price v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Price v. State, 154 S.W. 545, 69 Tex. Crim. 492, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 144 (Tex. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a conviction for aggravated assault.

The statement of facts is not incorporated in nor accompanies the record, nor does the record contain any bill of exceptions.

. The motion for new trial sets up the fact,—first, that appellant pleaded guilty on the advice of his father and that his father induced appellant to. plead guilty on the representation of the County Attorney, and that by such representations 'they were both induced to believe defendant would receive the lowest punishment. This is not verified in any manner. It is signed, however, by defendant through his counsel. The record does not contain ahy evidence introduced in support of the allegation, nor was any bill of exception reserved verifying the matter mentioned. The same may be said about the allegations contained in the second ground of the motion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a conviction for aggravated assault.

The statement of facts is not incorporated in nor accompanies the record, nor does the record contain any bill of exceptions.

. The motion for new trial sets up the fact,—first, that appellant pleaded guilty on the advice of his father and that his father induced appellant to. plead guilty on the representation of the County Attorney, and that by such representations 'they were both induced to believe defendant would receive the lowest punishment. This is not verified in any manner. It is signed, however, by defendant through his counsel. The record does not contain ahy evidence introduced in support of the allegation, nor was any bill of exception reserved verifying the matter mentioned. The same may be said about the allegations contained in the second ground of the motion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 S.W. 545, 69 Tex. Crim. 492, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-state-texcrimapp-1913.