Price v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Price v. State

1912 OK CR 299, 122 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 719, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 123

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 18, 1912

DocketNo. A-889.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 299 (Price v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Price v. State, 1912 OK CR 299, 122 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 719, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 123 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Price, the plaintiff in error, was convicted' in the superior court of PittsbuTg county at the March, 1910, term, on a charge of assault with intent to'kill, and on the 12th day of said month was sentenced by the court, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, to serve eighteen months in the state penitentiary. The appeal was filed in this court on the 12th day of September, 1910. No brief has been filed and no appearance made for oral argument. We have carefully examined the record, and find no error sufficiently prejudicial to justify reversal of this judgment. The Attorney General has entered a motion to affirm for want of prosecution. The motion is sustained, and the judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William Price, the plaintiff in error, was convicted' in the superior court of PittsbuTg county at the March, 1910, term, on a charge of assault with intent to'kill, and on the 12th day of said month was sentenced by the court, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, to serve eighteen months in the state penitentiary. The appeal was filed in this court on the 12th day of September, 1910. No brief has been filed and no appearance made for oral argument. We have carefully examined the record, and find no error sufficiently prejudicial to justify reversal of this judgment. The Attorney General has entered a motion to affirm for want of prosecution. The motion is sustained, and the judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 299, 122 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 719, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.