Price v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Price v. State

184 So. 2d 681, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5728

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 31, 1966

DocketNo. H-306

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 184 So. 2d 681 (Price v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Price v. State, 184 So. 2d 681, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5728 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for the offense of Robbery in July 1965. In December 1965, his petition filed under Criminal Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 appendix was denied. Order of insolvency and appointment of counsel was entered in January 1966. Notice of appeal was filed by the public defender’s office pursuant to the order appointing the public defender to represent appellant on his appeal. The Public Defender now petitions this court for leave to withdraw as counsel and alleges, inter alia, that he defended the appellant at the trial wherein he was convicted; that he has made a careful study of the court file and the applicable law and can find no merit to the appellant’s contention as indicated in his Criminal Rule 1 petition nor in his appeal and that to pursue the appeal would be -frivolous.

Similar situations have arisen before and where good cause for withdrawal was shown as we think is shown here, the motion to withdraw has been granted. Carr [682]*682v. State, Fla.App., 180 So.2d 381. McNealy v. State, 1st D.C.A., 183 So.2d 738, filed March 8, 1966.

The motion to withdraw is granted, and the appellant is granted thirty days from the date this opinion is filed within which to file his assignments of error and supporting brief.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and STURGIS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for the offense of Robbery in July 1965. In December 1965, his petition filed under Criminal Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 appendix was denied. Order of insolvency and appointment of counsel was entered in January 1966. Notice of appeal was filed by the public defender’s office pursuant to the order appointing the public defender to represent appellant on his appeal. The Public Defender now petitions this court for leave to withdraw as counsel and alleges, inter alia, that he defended the appellant at the trial wherein he was convicted; that he has made a careful study of the court file and the applicable law and can find no merit to the appellant’s contention as indicated in his Criminal Rule 1 petition nor in his appeal and that to pursue the appeal would be -frivolous.

Similar situations have arisen before and where good cause for withdrawal was shown as we think is shown here, the motion to withdraw has been granted. Carr [682]*682v. State, Fla.App., 180 So.2d 381. McNealy v. State, 1st D.C.A., 183 So.2d 738, filed March 8, 1966.

The motion to withdraw is granted, and the appellant is granted thirty days from the date this opinion is filed within which to file his assignments of error and supporting brief.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and STURGIS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 So. 2d 681, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-state-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack