Price v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Price v. State

88 So. 64, 17 Ala. App. 651, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 8

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 18, 1921

Docket3 Div. 365.

StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 64 (Price v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Price v. State, 88 So. 64, 17 Ala. App. 651, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 8 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

The only insistence made by the defendant is that the court should have granted him a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. There was sufficient evidence to submit the question of guilt to the jury and to sustain the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMEORD, J.

The only insistence made by the defendant is that the court should have granted him a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. There was sufficient evidence to submit the question of guilt to the jury and to sustain the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 So. 64, 17 Ala. App. 651, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-state-alactapp-1921.