Price v. State
88 So. 64, 17 Ala. App. 651, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 8
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Price v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 Ala. App. 78 →
Opinion
The only insistence made by the defendant is that the court should have granted him a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. There was sufficient evidence to submit the question of guilt to the jury and to sustain the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Price v. State, 88 So. 64, 17 Ala. App. 651, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 8 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).
88 So. 64 (Price v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.