Price v. State

531 So. 2d 699, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 606, 1988 WL 105210
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedAugust 23, 1988
Docket4 Div. 478
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 531 So. 2d 699 (Price v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Price v. State, 531 So. 2d 699, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 606, 1988 WL 105210 (Ala. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

PATTERSON, Judge.

Pursuant to its finding that Price was not entitled to a judgment of acquittal, our supreme court reversed our finding that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence to connect Price with the marijuana and remanded the cause to this court for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Ex parte State (In re: Robinette, Price, Fenn), 531 So.2d 697 (Ala.1988).

We have reviewed Price’s only other issue and find it to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the lower court adjudging Price guilty is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rogers v. State
543 So. 2d 719 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 So. 2d 699, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 606, 1988 WL 105210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-state-alacrimapp-1988.