Price v. State
This text of 531 So. 2d 699 (Price v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT
Pursuant to its finding that Price was not entitled to a judgment of acquittal, our supreme court reversed our finding that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence to connect Price with the marijuana and remanded the cause to this court for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Ex parte State (In re: Robinette, Price, Fenn), 531 So.2d 697 (Ala.1988).
We have reviewed Price’s only other issue and find it to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the lower court adjudging Price guilty is hereby affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
531 So. 2d 699, 1988 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 606, 1988 WL 105210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-state-alacrimapp-1988.