Price v. Smock
This text of 3 N.J.L. 206 (Price v. Smock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The credits, in order to reduce the demand to the sum, of which the justice bath jurisdiction, ought to be specifically set out. In the present case, the amoxunt of the credits to be deducted is not mentioned; it, therefore, does not appear that they will reduce the sum demanded, within the justice’s jurisdiction; from the face of the. demand, then, it appears, that it exceeded the sum, of which the justice had jurisdiction; and for this cause, judgment must be reversed. There were several other reasons assigned [*] for the reversal of this judgment, but the Court reversing on the first reason, gave no opinion on the others,
Sic post. #528, 561, 661. 1 South, 104, 220. 4 Halst. 118.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.J.L. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-smock-nj-1807.