Price v. Robinson
This text of 2 Del. Cas. 555 (Price v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The affidavit should state the fact that Hanson is a seafaring man and should show some reason why the case should be proceeded in differently from common cases. That the witnesses exclusively know the facts is no reason for granting the motion. There are two witnesses to the fact; and a knowledge of the fact does not remain with one only. If the affidavit were to state that Hanson is a seafaring man and likely to be absent, his deposition might be taken de bene esse; and so if any reason were assigned to show that the complainant was in danger of losing the testimony of Simmons.
Motion refused.
An additional affidavit was filed and the order was made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Del. Cas. 555, 1820 Del. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-robinson-delch-1820.