Price v. Rimes Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Price v. Rimes Bros.

94 S.E. 817, 21 Ga. App. 580, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 412

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 21, 1918

Docket8863

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 817 (Price v. Rimes Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Price v. Rimes Bros., 94 S.E. 817, 21 Ga. App. 580, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 412 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1'. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are without merit.

2. Where in a suit on an open account the allegation in the petition and the total of the bill of particulars showed an indebtedness of $85.11, and after verdict it was discovered that the items of the account, when correctly added, made only $84.11, the judge did not err in allowing the plaintiff to write off from the verdict the amount of $1.

3. There was some evidence to support the verdict; and “whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Toole v. Jones, 19 Ga. App. 24 (90 S. E. 732); McCarty v. Keys, 19 Ga. App. 494 (91 S. E. 875).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI