Price v. Price

397 Mich. 962, 1976 Mich. LEXIS 1155
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Price v. Price. Read the opinion of the Court — 395 Mich. 6
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 29, 1976·No. Docket No. 55699·Published

Opinion

Application by defendant-appellee for allowing an act after expiration of time is considered and the Court orders that defendant-appellee’s pleadings be considered on their merits, lateness notwithstanding. The motion by defendant-appellee for clarification is considered and, pursuant to GCR 1963, 865.1(7), the case is remanded to the Saginaw Circuit Court for a factual hearing. If the trial judge is convinced by the evidence that Thomas C. Price did not attend college in the 1972-73 school year for reasons other than financial inability, the trial court’s order of September 18, 1972 shall be vacated. See 46 Am Jur 2d, Judgments, § 443; Zwerg v Zwerg, 179 So 2d 821, 825 (Miss, 1965). The petition by plaintiff for extraordinary attorney fees also is remanded for further consideration by the trial judge.

Ryan, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. Price, 397 Mich. 962, 1976 Mich. LEXIS 1155 (Mich. 1976).

397 Mich. 962 (Price v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.