Price v. Price
This text of 142 Ala. 631 (Price v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We do not commit ourselves to the proposition that the chancery court has jurisdiction to decree the annulment or declare the invalidity of marriage on the ground of insanity of a party or the parties at the time of solemnization; but assuming such jurisdiction to exist, we have no difficulty in concurring with the conclusion of the chancellor that this is not a proper case for its exercise. In the first place, if Mrs. Price was insane at the time of the marriage, the complainant has waited too long to file his bill: They were married thirty-three years before bill was filed. Soon after the marriage complainant had notice of the conditions upon which it is now sought to predicate insanity. It is too late now for him to proceed in the premises. But in the second place, the evidence fails to reasonably satisfy us that Mrs. Price was insane at the time of her marriage.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 Ala. 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-price-ala-1904.