Price v. Perry

9 S.C.L. 31
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 15, 1818·Published

Opinion

[32]*32The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cheves.

The evidence to contradict or vary the legal efFedt of the endorsement, 1 think, was not legally admissible: but that is not made a question in this case. The evidence went to the Jury, and was fairly submitted to them. They were the proper judges of it, and the Court sees no reason to believe they drew a wrong conclusion. The motion is, therefore, refused.

Grimké, Colcock, Gantt, and Johnson, J. concurred. Mott, J. dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. Perry, 9 S.C.L. 31 (S.C. 1818).

9 S.C.L. 31 (Price v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.