Price v. Metropolitan Transit Agency
This text of 459 So. 2d 1180 (Price v. Metropolitan Transit Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Finding that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant a continuance requested by counsel for the purpose of filing appropriate pleadings following the death of one of the plaintiffs, and in dismissing for lack of prosecution pending actions for personal injury and for wrongful death, we reverse and remand. See Rountree v. Rountree, 72 So.2d 794 (Fla.1954); Crown Trading Co. v. Systems for Security, Inc., 400 So.2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); §§ 46.021, 734.101, Fla.Stat. (1977); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.260(a)(1), 1.440.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 So. 2d 1180, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2611, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-metropolitan-transit-agency-fladistctapp-1984.