Price v. McCoy Sales & Services, Inc.

31 Ohio Law Rep. 43
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 5, 1965
Docket38494
StatusPublished

This text of 31 Ohio Law Rep. 43 (Price v. McCoy Sales & Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Price v. McCoy Sales & Services, Inc., 31 Ohio Law Rep. 43 (Ohio 1965).

Opinion

Herbert, Judge.

1. The granting of a motion for a new trial is a final appealable order as provided in Section 2505.02 of the Revised Code, (Green v. Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co., 156 OhioSt. 1, 45 O.O. 32, overruled; Youngstown Municipal Ry. Co. v. City of Youngstown, 147 OhioSt. 221, 34 O.O. 122, approved and followed.)

2. The trial court must specify in writing the causes for which a new trial is granted. (Section 2321.17, Revised Code.)

3. Where a jury determines that the independent concurrent negligence of one of two defendants was the proximate cause of the injury complained of, such defendant is not prejudiced by a verdict of the jury finding that the independent concurrent negligence of the other defendant was not a proximate cause of the injury.

Judgment reversed.

Zimmerman, Matthias and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Taft, C. J., Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur in paragraph one of the syllabus (excepting its reference to the Youngstown case), in paragraph two of the syllabus and in the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Youngstown Municipal Ry. Co. v. City of Youngstown
70 N.E.2d 649 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ohio Law Rep. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-mccoy-sales-services-inc-ohio-1965.