Price v. Little

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Price v. Little

101 A. 645, 257 Pa. 312, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 731

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 23, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 193

StatusPublished

This text of 101 A. 645 (Price v. Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Price v. Little, 101 A. 645, 257 Pa. 312, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 731 (Pa. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In this action for libel the verdict was for the defendant, and from the judgment on it the plaintiff has appealed. What is termed the first assignment of error is but a legal conclusion of counsel, and is, therefore, dismissed. By the second assignment error is charged in the quoted portion of the instructions to the jury. While the learned trial judge might properly have omitted from his charge what is complained of, no legal error is discoverable in it, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

In this action for libel the verdict was for the defendant, and from the judgment on it the plaintiff has appealed. What is termed the first assignment of error is but a legal conclusion of counsel, and is, therefore, dismissed. By the second assignment error is charged in the quoted portion of the instructions to the jury. While the learned trial judge might properly have omitted from his charge what is complained of, no legal error is discoverable in it, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A. 645, 257 Pa. 312, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-little-pa-1917.