Price v. Limehouse

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Price v. Limehouse

15 S.C.L. 544

DecidedApril 15, 1828

StatusPublished

This text of 15 S.C.L. 544 (Price v. Limehouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Price v. Limehouse, 15 S.C.L. 544 (S.C. Ct. App. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

Cujua per

Nott, J.

The Court concur in opinion with the Judge below.

I will avail myself of this opportunity to correct an expression whieh I made use of in the case of Marshall & Giles—2 Const. R. Tread. Ed. 637—that a distress will not be allowed except where “rent is> reserved eo nomine.” It is not necessary that it should be reserved by the name of rent. — It is suffi-tient if it shall appear to be for the use and occupation of lands or houses, though not denominated rent. The mot ion is therefore refused'.

Judgment-affirmed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cujua per

Nott, J.

The Court concur in opinion with the Judge below.

I will avail myself of this opportunity to correct an expression whieh I made use of in the case of Marshall & Giles—2 Const. R. Tread. Ed. 637—that a distress will not be allowed except where “rent is> reserved eo nomine.” It is not necessary that it should be reserved by the name of rent. — It is suffi-tient if it shall appear to be for the use and occupation of lands or houses, though not denominated rent. The mot ion is therefore refused'.

Judgment-affirmed..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 S.C.L. 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-limehouse-scctapp-1828.