Price v. Levy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Price v. Levy

26 A.D. 620, 50 N.Y.S. 636

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D. 620 (Price v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Price v. Levy, 26 A.D. 620, 50 N.Y.S. 636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellants did not observe or file an exception to the decision of the Special Term upon which the judgment appealed from was entered, and they are, therefore, not in a position to challenge the conclusion reached by that court. (Millar v. Larmer, 85 Hun, 313.) Where a decision is made under section 1022 of the Code of Civil Procedure, an exception to the decision is necessary to present anything for review. Yo exception having been taken to the decision, 'there is nothing for the appellate court to review, and the judgment entered upon it must be affirmed. (Smith v. Moulson, 88 Hun, 147.)

It follows that the judgment must be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Patterson, O’Brien, Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appellants did not observe or file an exception to the decision of the Special Term upon which the judgment appealed from was entered, and they are, therefore, not in a position to challenge the conclusion reached by that court. (Millar v. Larmer, 85 Hun, 313.) Where a decision is made under section 1022 of the Code of Civil Procedure, an exception to the decision is necessary to present anything for review. Yo exception having been taken to the decision, 'there is nothing for the appellate court to review, and the judgment entered upon it must be affirmed. (Smith v. Moulson, 88 Hun, 147.)

It follows that the judgment must be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Patterson, O’Brien, Ingraham and McLaughlin, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D. 620, 50 N.Y.S. 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-levy-nyappdiv-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack