Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Price v. Johnson

Price v. Johnson

10 P.3d 294, 169 Or. App. 579, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1421
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 30, 2000
Docket97-05-28839M; CA A108170
StatusPublished

This text of 10 P.3d 294 (Price v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Price v. Johnson, 10 P.3d 294, 169 Or. App. 579, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1421 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals from a judgment against him for costs and the amount of his court-appointed attorney fees in a previous post-conviction proceeding. Defendant concedes that, because petitioner’s original petition was filed before January 1, 1998, the court had no authority to order repayment of court-appointed attorney fees. See Alexander v. Johnson, 164 Or App 235, 237, 990 P2d 929 (1999). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand for the entry of a corrected judgment for costs only.

Reversed and remanded for entry of corrected judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. Johnson
990 P.2d 929 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 P.3d 294, 169 Or. App. 579, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-johnson-orctapp-2000.